Risk assessment of mental strain.
Simple. Structured. Actionable.
Capture mental strain at work, prioritise fields of action and implement legal requirements in a structured way.
Why organisations take action
Unfavourable working conditions do not remain without consequences.
Productivity
Absence
Quality
Turnover
Capacity for innovation
Your legal duty, our effective approach.
Legal requirement
Section 5 of the German Occupational Health and Safety Act obliges companies to identify and assess psychological loads at work.
Anonymous by design
Employers receive aggregated results only. Individual employee results are never made available to them.
Action-oriented
Clear results instead of a data graveyard.
A good risk assessment is not bureaucracy, but the foundation for healthy, high-performing and future-ready organisations.
We look at the relevant working conditions.
Systematic. Understandable. Work-related.
Work content and workload
Work organisation and working time
Leadership
Communication
Collaboration
Work environment
We do not ask about:
- Private problems
- Medical diagnoses
- Personal or biographical circumstances
We assess:
- Work-related strain
- Organisational conditions
- Concrete options for improvement
The benefits for your organisation.
More than meeting a requirement.
Identify risks early
Make adverse working conditions visible and identify the need for action at an early stage.
Improve working conditions
Focus on the relevant levers and apply measures where they are genuinely needed.
Strengthen the organisation
Support performance, reduce friction and retain employees over the long term.
Implement requirements systematically
Document results, measures and responsibilities in a transparent way.
Improving working conditions creates the foundation for better results and sustainable performance.
Clear results instead of a data graveyard.
You receive the information you need for decisions and implementation.
Digital survey
Conducted simply, anonymously and systematically.
Analysis and interpretation
Results by relevant work area and organisational unit.
Management summary
The key findings and anomalies at a glance.
Prioritised fields of action
A clear classification by relevance and need for action.
Measures and documentation
Concrete starting points, responsibilities and a basis for implementation and effectiveness reviews.
Psychological strain by area
Excerpt from the management report
highElevated strain, prompt action required
mediumNotable findings, keep monitoring
lowNo concerns, no immediate action needed
- PDF report for the organisation
- Personal debriefing session
- Prioritised fields of action as a working basis
Illustrative example of an aggregated analysis.
Our clear five-step process.
Transparent. Predictable. Efficient.
Prepare
Clarify goals, define areas and plan communication.
Survey
Conduct an anonymous digital survey of employees.
Analyse and assess
Analyse results and interpret relevant strain.
Derive measures
Prioritise fields of action, clarify responsibilities and document measures.
Review effectiveness
Support implementation and review development.
We accompany the process from preparation to the effectiveness review. Scope and support depend on your organisation.
Frequently asked questions.
The survey is designed to be anonymous. Answers are analysed in aggregated form only. Employers never receive individual results of single employees.
Participation itself usually takes a few minutes. The overall survey period depends on the size and structure of your organisation.
The works council can be involved from the start, for example in objectives, questionnaire, communication and analysis logic. This builds acceptance and eases later implementation.
The risk assessment is reviewed and updated when relevant changes occur. The appropriate rhythm depends on working conditions and the development of your organisation.
Results are interpreted and translated into prioritised fields of action. Measures are then planned, documented and reviewed for their effect.
Measures, responsibilities and timeframes are documented transparently. The subsequent effectiveness review shows whether adjustments are needed.
Yes, it can focus on defined areas or organisational units. The analysis must remain anonymous and the selected scope must be professionally meaningful.
In a non-binding initial conversation, we clarify the starting situation, goals and stakeholders. You then receive a suitable proposal for scope and process.
The first step
Ready when you are.
Let us find out together how you can implement the risk assessment meaningfully and systematically in your organisation.
- 30-minute orientation conversation
- Tailored to your situation
- Personal and non-binding
- A clear next step for your organisation